Page 121 - ΝΑΥΤΙΚΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΑ - MARTIOS 2023
P. 121

reporting requirements of the EU MRV Regulation
 and the IMO DCS. Furthermore, in April 2018, the
 IMO agreed on an Initial Strategy for the reduction
 of GHG emissions from ships to reduce total annual
 GHG emissions from international shipping by at
 least 50% by 2050, compared to 2008.

 IMO- levels of ambition
 The Initial Strategy’s levels of ambition are:
 (i)  Strengthening  the  energy  efficiency  design
 requirements for ships to reduce their carbon
 intensity (ii) Reducing CO2 emissions per transport
 work, as an average across international shipping, by
 at least 40% by 2030, pursuing efforts towards 70%
 by 2050, compared to 2008. (iii) Pursuing efforts
 consistent with the Paris Agreement temperature
 goals - the 2015 Paris Agreement was agreed
 upon by parties to the United Nations Framework
 Convention on Climate Change, according to which
 the global temperature rise this century should be
 kept well below 2 degrees, and preferably to 1.5
 degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial levels.

 The advantages and disadvantages of incorporating
 by Directive 2018/410 emphasises the  international shipping into EU-ETS, according to the ECSA-
 need to act on shipping emissions.  ICS study dated July 2020
   –  Monitoring,  reporting  and  verification     –  Potential advantages: it is a proven
 (MRV) is to be effected according to   mechanism for allocating carbon permits
 Regulation 2015/757 (as amended by   and trading platforms; by allowing the
 Delegated Regulation 2016/2071) - EU   price on carbon, it is ensured that CO2
 MRV Regulation.  emissions are reduced in the most
   –  The European Commission also supports   economical way; the already-implemented
 the implementation of international energy   EU MRV system for ships trading
 efficiency rules and standards, i.e., the   internationally to and from the EU can
 Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) and   serve as a basis for the implementation
 the Ship Energy Efficiency Management   of the EU-ETS in shipping.
 Plan (SEEMP).    –  Potential  disadvantages:  risk  of
 undermining IMO negotiations on the
 Obligations of companies under the EU MRV Regulation  implementation of the Initial Strategy on
 From 2019, the companies, through THETIS MRV,   the Reduction of GHG from Ships; greater
 submit to the Commission and the flag States a   uncertainty over the price of emitting a
 satisfactorily verified emissions report for each ship   tonne of CO2, as it depends on supply and
 that has performed maritime transport activities   demand; significant administrative burden
 in the European Economic Area in the previous   and cost compared to other MBMs;
 calendar year. In addition, from 2019, companies   unlikely to address the complexity of the
 shall ensure that their vessels visiting ports in   shipping market (numerous ship types,
 the European Economic Area carry on board a   contractual relationships, etc.); funds
 document of compliance issued by THETIS MRV by   raised from carbon allowances bought by
 June of each year; this obligation may be subject to   the shipping sector are not retained in the
 inspections by Member States’ authorities.  shipping sector.

 IMO Data collection system and the initial greenhouse   Proposal for an International Maritime Research and
 emissions strategy   Development Fund
 In March 2018, the IMO adopted a mandatory Fuel   In March/April 2020, ICS, BIMCO, CLIA,
 Oil Data Collection System (DCS), which came into   INTERCARGO,  INTERFERRY, INTERTANKO,
 effect on 1 January 2019, by which ships calling into   IPTA and WSC submitted to the IMO a Proposal
 European Economic Area ports must comply with the   to establish an International Maritime Research


 120
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126