Page 159 - ΝΑΥΤΙΚΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΑ - ΜΑΙΟΣ 2024
P. 159

a ship has to wait for days until a service engineer is
            available to attend to the vessel and correct a soft-
            ware malfunction. Additionally, until recently, the
            industry had no performance standards for marine
            equipment software. In fact, the software used for
            controlling a marine boiler was similar to that used
            for the control of a home appliance.
            We have now reached a point where makers’ efforts
            to rapidly develop their systems to increase their
            competitiveness have led to a scarcity of proper
            after-sales services. Support for their previous mod-
            els is very low on their list of commercial priorities.
            Moreover, makers do not manufacture all their
            machine components themselves. They often rely
            on suppliers that are not reliable and do not under-
            stand the importance and urgency of rectifying
            marine equipment malfunctions.
            The problem has become more pronounced in
            recent years, with many makers declaring a change
            in their policy, stating that previous models are
            obsolete, and proposing the complete replacement
            of units with new models.
            Some of this equipment is critical for the operation
            of a ship. For instance, makers’ main engine control
            systems become obsolete after just 8 or 10 years
            from their installation. The cost of the control sys-
            tem’s new model ranges from $25,000 to $30,000,
            and its delivery takes four to five months. In addi-
            tion, cables must be replaced, a service engineer   rarely proposed and very expensive. Some owners
            needs to attend, and a Class plan approval and new   have managed to obtain a written guarantee from
            sea trials are required. In the best-case scenario,   makers during newbuilding project negotiations,
            when the replacement is organised in advance as a   ensuring that their equipment will be supported
            precaution prior to the malfunction of the existing   for at least a minimum period of 15 years. However,
            system, the total cost, including fuel and off-hire for   soon after delivery, when the time for after-sales
            sea trials, exceeds $140,000-$150,000.     service came, some makers came up with excuses,
            MARTECMA receives complaints about makers’   such as the closure of the subcontractor’s factory
            after-sales services from several members, and the   and component unavailability in the market.
            topic is discussed at every regular meeting. We have   The issue of after-sales support is magnified as
            gathered feedback and examined the existing regu-  well-established makers have increased their mar-
            lations; it is indeed a rather complex issue. The EU   ket share, leaving few alternative options.
            regulation requires that the certification of marine   With the application of new technologies, it is vital
            equipment as per European standards be on board   that makers invest in after-sales services to tackle
            and valid for a minimum of ten years after instal-  the expected teething problems. The only way for-
            lation. However, this requirement is not universally   ward is to hire and train service engineers, design
            interpreted as mandating that the maker cannot   different models that use the same parts, and cre-
            declare the equipment obsolete within that period.   ate an optimum number of parts in stock. Owners
            Instead, the obligation of makers to provide or not   and ship managers should also consider the advan-
            provide spare parts and service engineer support   tages of fleets with sister ships and a stock of parts
            is considered a commercial issue.          that can be used across multiple ships. However,
            I believe the severity of the matter has not been fully   introducing these changes will take a long time.
            realised. Despite the best efforts of ship managers,   Until after-sales service improves, there are daily
            obsolete systems may be impossible to maintain   challenges that impose a tremendous burden on
            to proper standards, which is not a purely financial   companies. Managing ships at risk of being out of
            issue but also a safety concern.           the market due to a lack of spares and support or
            Very few makers are willing to offer a fixed yearly   trying to keep them running until the necessary
            maintenance contract that includes equipment   spare  parts  become  available  poses  financial,
            replacement when it becomes obsolete. This is   safety, and environmental risks.


                                                                                                            155
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164