Page 51 - ΝΑΥΤΙΚΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΑ - ΜΑΙΟΣ 2024
P. 51

The President of Louis Dreyfus Armateurs S.A., Philippe Louis-Dreyfus, elaborates on the
            main challenges currently facing the shipping industry, from environmental regulations
            and technological uncertainties to concerns about the industry’s public image.













                                 EUROPEAN


                                 SHIPOWNERS



                                 TRYING TO CHART


                                 THE FUTURE OF



                                 SHIPPING













            Philippe Louis-Dreyfus,   ❶  In light of the current surge in envi-  considered of high importance. In any case, bulk/
            President of Louis          ronmental regulations in the shipping   tramp shipping alone accounts for over 70% of
            Dreyfus Armateurs S.A.      industry at a time when all available   world shipping. Nevertheless, some shipowners
            and former President
            of ECSA & BIMCO             technological solutions have uncertain   in the ferry or liner business still felt worried and
                                        results, you have frequently advo-  did not support the idea in the beginning.
            talks to                    cated speed reduction to minimise   Also, any such measure should not only apply
            Giannis Theodoropoulos      shipping’s carbon footprint. Why do   to France or Europe but worldwide and must be
                                        you think such a proposal is not being   decided and implemented by the IMO, which
                                        heard by international legislators even   unfortunately could not garner a majority for such
                                        though it can be implemented immedi-  a decision. That really came as a surprise.
                                        ately and have definite results?  Lastly, I am not convinced that everyone in the
                                 For many  years now, I have been advocat-  maritime cluster favours such a measure. Clients
                                 ing speed limitation as an obvious solution for   and charterers, who often have a short-term per-
                                 reducing maritime emissions. This idea is easy to   spective, see more problems than advantages in
                                 understand - all car drivers are aware of it; speed   speed reduction. There is also a lot of profit to be
                                 limitation carries no substantial cost and is imme-  made from discovering the most appropriate fuel
                                 diately efficient. Normally, it should also be easy   and the most efficient engine or ship design, even
                                 to implement. However, as you have mentioned,   though these are neither immediately efficient
                                 it has faced criticism, if not outright opposition,   nor the most economical solutions.
                                 much of which is irrelevant.            All of this is deeply disappointing. However, the
                                 I have always emphasised that speed limitation   new regulations on shipping are stringent enough
                                 should be applied to bulk transportation, leaving   to make speed reduction the only possible solu-
                                 out ferries and liner services, for which speed is   tion until new technologies become available.


                                                                                                             49
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56